Once an Eagle Essay

Leadership is an meaning(a) characteristic in any field. primeval on, it has been recognized that the victor of any administration is highly dependent upon the quality of lead. change surface if the organization has a number of bright individuals, without strong loss attractionship, there would be no success. In a similar light, the success of the soldiers depends on strong attractorship. It has been give tongue to that in the soldiery, leadership is a requisite.As an integral component in warf are, leadership determines the outcome of combat procedures, without it, it can be fairly argued that no military operation would be success. As the brain, leaders are expected to have the power of command. The subordinates in the group all rely upon the leader to leave behind wisdom and guidance, non to summon subtle judgment. It is essential, thereof, that a good leader has the following characteristics such as personal appeal, confidence, live judgment, wisdom and inte lligence.Military history is make full with individuals who were born leaders. A brief coup doeil into the role of monuments and military commanders will wear out a common characteristic, they were all excellent leaders. The civil war gave rise to many another(prenominal) a(prenominal) superior commanders such as Joshua Chamberlain and basin Logan who, disrespect their lack of military training, were sufficient to lead their legions into combat and revive many victories. The requisite ability that these very well commanders have was the ability to inspire their march by providing an excellent example.Unlike separate leaders, these fine leaders chose to lead by example. They were regarded as the epitomes of self-sacrifice and honor. None of them felt that they were too heavy to be left wing out of the battlefield and they were never hesitant to take their place in the frontlines should it be required of them. This aspect is what made them leaders. some other impo rtant aspect of leadership that is take up exemplified by the actions of General Robert E. Lee who not only won the mettle of his legions but overly exhibited a gift for disciplined application.While it may not be essential to have the affection of ones troops during war, as shown by General Ulysses S. Grant, current military strategies emphasize the importance of a leader who is not only able to provide sound judgment but who is also able to inspire his troops. Charisma unite with the ability to make the topper decisions in any given authority would therefore be the essence of excellent leadership. The fence for this is that in achieving ones terminal it is necessary that it be accomplished by means of motivation, direction and purpose.These essential characteristics have been shown by many of the great Commanders during the Second instauration war including but not special(a) to General Douglas McArthur who liberated Australia and the Philippines from Japanese occupat ion. It is tall(prenominal) to say which style works the best as it is possible that the combination of charisma and the ability to make the best decisions in any given situation may be exhibit in many different forms of leadership.Leaders may sometimes be directors, participators or even delegators. Yet, it is not so much how the practice their leadership but their ability to get results. The military operations during the rootage Gulf War gave rise to a new parentage of military commanders who were able to obtain results despite the differences in their leadership styles. Commanders such as Norman Schwarzkopf and Collin Powell demonstrated that leadership invite not necessarily be overbearing.The important thing is that the commander understands the importance of the situation and is able to use the abilities of the troops, despite the limitations, to accomplish the intended results. In any case, it mustiness be remembered that the leadership that these great commanders poss essed was not limited to the battlefield. From the very first day that they took command, they showed their leadership and cultivated the necessary traits that they felt was needed in their troops in order to become strong in future tasks.